
It's regular as clockwork.
Every time the clocks change, there are cries of "no fair!" from the UK's more southerly citizens.
Surely we could have more daylight if we changed our whole time system, they argue?
They do have a point. From their perspective, they are losing daylight in the evenings. Surely, they say, it would be better to stumble around in the dark in the early mornings when no one needs the light too much? Surely it would be better to have slightly longer light in the evenings?
Unfortunately, the up-to-now excellent 10:10 campaign has decided to take on this cause. They're linking it to CO2 emissions. Surely the pollution will reduce with everyone getting more daylight in their lives?
I have my doubts. For a start, the whole thing only benefits those in Southern England. If you move the clocks forward, then Scottish schoolchildren and office workers will still be sitting in the dark at 10am. How does having darkness at 10am reduce CO2 emissions?
Conversely, in the evening during the winter it will be getting dark at 5pm instead of 4pm. That's not that big a difference, and certainly won't change the habits of those who shuffle home and then plonk themselves in front of the telly with a ready meal for the rest of the evening.
As for road safety, I heard one politician on the radio say with assurance that lighter evenings will mean less road accidents, because people are more alert then.
More alert after work? Surely you jest. And besides, the increase in accidents during the darker mornings doesn't seem to have been taken into account.
So I'm sorry 10:10, but this is one campaign I will not be signing up to.



















